Communication Optimal Multi-valued Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement with Optimal Resilience

نویسندگان

  • Arpita Patra
  • C. Pandu Rangan
چکیده

Byzantine Agreement (BA) and Broadcast (BC) are considered to be the most fundamental primitives for fault-tolerant distributed computing and cryptographic protocols. An important variant of BA and BC is Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement (ABA) and Asynchronous Broadcast (called as A-cast) respectively. Most often in the literature, protocols for ABA and A-cast were designed for a single bit message. But in many applications, these protocols may be invoked on long message rather than on single bit. Therefore, it is important to design efficient multi-valued protocols (i.e. protocols with long message) which extract advantage of directly dealing with long messages and are far better than multiple invocations to existing protocols for single bit. In synchronous network settings, this line of research was initiated by Turpin and Coan [27] and later it is culminated in the result of Fitzi et al. [15] who presented the first ever communication optimal (i.e. the communication complexity is minimal in asymptotic sense) multi-valued BA and BC protocols with the help of BA and BC protocols for short message. It was left open in [15] to achieve the same in asynchronous settings. In [21], the authors presented a communication optimal multi-valued Acast using existing A-cast [6] for small message. Here we achieve the same for ABA which is known to be harder problem than A-cast. Specifically, we design a communication optimal, optimally resilient (allows maximum fault tolerance) multi-valued ABA protocol, based on the existing ABA protocol for short message.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Error-free Multi-valued Broadcast and Byzantine Agreement with Optimal Communication Complexity

In this paper we present first ever error-free, asynchronous broadcast (called as A-cast) and Byzantine Agreement (called as ABA) protocols with optimal communication complexity and fault tolerance. Our protocols are multi-valued, meaning that they deal with l bit input and achieve communication complexity of O(nl) bits for large enough l for a set of n ≥ 3t+1 parties in which at most t can be ...

متن کامل

Communication Optimal Multi-Valued Asynchronous Broadcast and Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement

Asynchronous Broadcast (known as A-cast) and Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement (ABA)are the fundamental primitives used as a building block in many asynchronous distributed crypto-graphic tasks, such as Asynchronous Multiparty Computation (AMPC), Asynchronous VerifiableSecret Sharing (AVSS) etc. The A-cast and ABA protocols are carried out among n parties, wheret out of n parties...

متن کامل

Optimal Resilience Asynchronous Approximate Agreement

Consider an asynchronous system where each process begins with an arbitrary real value. Given some fixed > 0, an approximate agreement algorithm must have all non-faulty processes decide on values that are at most from each other and are in the range of the initial values of the non-faulty processes. Previous constructions solved asynchronous approximate agreement only when there were at least ...

متن کامل

Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement with Optimal Resilience and Linear Complexity

Given a system with n > 3t+1 processes, where t is the tolerated number of faulty ones, we present a fast asynchronous Byzantine agreement protocol that can reach agreement in O(t) expected running time. This improves the O(n2) expected running time of Abraham, Dolev, and Halpern [1]. Furthermore, if n = (3 + ε)t for any ε > 0, our protocol can reach agreement in O(1/ε) expected running time. T...

متن کامل

Fast Asynchronous Consensus with Optimal Resilience

We give randomized agreement algorithms with constant expected running time in asynchronous systems subject to process failures, where up to a minority of processes may fail. We consider three types of process failures: crash, omission, and Byzantine. For crash or omission failures, we solve consensus assuming private channels or a publickey infrastructure, respectively. For Byzantine failures,...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009